Key result
Exercise capacity was significantly higher in the supine (1870 +/- 390 s) and full upright (1830 +/- 250 s) positions compared to the 70 degrees tilt position (1730 +/- 260 s; p<0.05).
Why the study?
Does body position affect left ventricular size, performance, hemodynamics, and exercise duration during resting and exercise radionuclide angiography in normal young males?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
Does body position affect left ventricular size, performance, hemodynamics, and exercise duration during resting and exercise radionuclide angiography in normal young males?
Absolute Event Rate: 1730% vs 1870%
p-value: p=<0.05
Body position significantly alters parameters of ventricular, cardiovascular, and exercise performance during bicycle ergometry, with supine and full upright positions yielding higher exercise capacity than a 70-degree tilt.
Body position influences exercise capacity in healthy males; hypothesis-generating for protocol standardization, should not yet change practice.
Twenty-one normal young male subjects underwent resting and exercise (bicycle) radionuclide angiography in the full supine and 70 degrees upright tilt positions in order to examine the effects of position on left ventricular size and performance, hemodynamics, and exercise duration. All subjects also underwent full (90 degrees) upright bicycle ergometry with respiratory gas analysis to establish the level of maximal exercise capacity for each. Body position significantly (p less than 0.05) affected resting and exercise cardiovascular parameters. End-diastolic and endsystolic left ventricular volumes and stroke volume were larger in the supine position, both at rest and during exercise. The cardiac output at rest and during exercise were comparable for the two positions; an increase in resting and exercise heart rate in the 70 degrees tilt position compensated for the reduced stroke volume of this posture. At maximal exercise, the 70 degrees upright position was associated with a greater response in left ventricular ejection fraction, otherwise this parameter was not position related. Exercise capacity, in terms of duration and workload, was significantly higher in the supine (1870 +/- 390 s) and full upright (1830 +/- 250 s) positions than in the 70 degrees tilt position (1730 +/- 260 s). Changes in body position significantly alter parameters of ventricular, cardiovascular, and exercise performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotsamire et al. (1987) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=21). 70 degrees upright tilt position vs. Full supine and full (90 degrees) upright positions was evaluated on Exercise capacity (duration in seconds) (p=<0.05). Exercise capacity was significantly higher in the supine (1870 +/- 390 s) and full upright (1830 +/- 250 s) positions compared to the 70 degrees tilt position (1730 +/- 260 s; p<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: