Key result
Combined ventriculographic parameters (fall in ejection fraction and wall motion worsening) identified multivessel coronary disease post-infarction with 62% sensitivity and 75% specificity.
Why the study?
Do clinical, bicycle exercise electrocardiographic, and radionuclide ventriculographic parameters accurately predict multivessel coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=110)
Do clinical, bicycle exercise electrocardiographic, and radionuclide ventriculographic parameters accurately predict multivessel coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction?
Alternative ventriculographic parameters, such as a fall in ejection fraction and wall motion worsening, offer higher sensitivity and information content than conventional clinical or ECG criteria for predicting multivessel CAD after MI.
May aid noninvasive multivessel CAD detection post-MI over clinical criteria; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
To assess alternative criteria for the prediction of multivessel coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction, we compared the clinical, bicycle electrocardiographic, and radionuclide ventriculographic (ejection fraction and wall motion) responses in 110 patients undergoing coronary angiography after myocardial infarction. Ninety-seven of the 110 patients had multivessel coronary artery disease (two or more diseased vessels). Clinical or electrocardiographic abnormalities were observed in 41 of 97 (sensitivity = 43%) patients with multivessel disease, and in only two of 13 (specificity = 85%) patients without multivessel disease. The average information content of these combined clinical and electrocardiographic variables relative to perfect discrimination was 5%. Among the scintigraphic parameters, the conventional criterion for ejection fraction abnormality, a rise of less than 5% had a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 62% for multivessel coronary artery disease, while a fall in ejection fraction of 5% or more had a sensitivity of 39% and specificity of 92% for multivessel coronary artery disease. The presence of an exercise wall motion abnormality in the nonadjacent noninfarcted (remote) region had a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 55% for multivessel coronary artery disease. A more stringent criterion, worsening of remote wall motion with exercise, had a sensitivity of 52% and specificity of 75%. When this latter criterion was combined with a fall in ejection fraction, the sensitivity for multivessel coronary artery disease increased to 62%, specificity remained 75%, and information content increased from 5% to 10%. We conclude that conventional diagnostic criteria for abnormal clinical, bicycle electrocardiographic, or scintigraphic results do not identify patients with additional coronary artery disease after infarction with high accuracy. Two alternative ventriculographic parameters--a fall in ejection fraction and wall motion worsening--are similar to clinical parameters in specificity, but have a higher sensitivity and information content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Morris et al. (1984) conducted a cross-sectional in myocardial infarction (n=110). Ventriculographic parameters (fall in ejection fraction and wall motion worsening) vs. Clinical and electrocardiographic parameters was evaluated on Prediction of multivessel coronary artery disease. Combined ventriculographic parameters (fall in ejection fraction and wall motion worsening) identified multivessel coronary disease post-infarction with 62% sensitivity and 75% specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: