Key result
Concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (OR 2.589), higher systolic blood pressure, and increased number of treatment cycles were identified as significant predictors for the development of proteinuria in cancer patients treated with anti-angiogenic agents.
Why the study?
Proteinuria restricts the dosing and efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents, but predictive factors and differences in proteinuria risk across specific agents or cancer types remained unclear.
Observational (n=124)
No
Odds Ratio: 2.589 (95% CI 1.09–6.146)
p-value: p=0.0311
Higher systolic blood pressure, greater number of treatment cycles, and use of calcium channel blockers are significant predictors of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria in cancer patients.
May inform closer proteinuria monitoring during anti-angiogenic therapy; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
The development of proteinuria restricts the dose of anti-angiogenic agents, thereby reducing their efficacy. Thus, this retrospective study was undertaken to identify predictive factors of the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria, and to elucidate if there is a difference in the likelihood of proteinuria among anti-angiogenic agents or cancer types, to help guide future strategies to improve the safety, efficacy, and quality of life of patients receiving chemotherapy. Between April 2014 and February 2019, 124 cancer patients at our outpatient chemotherapy center who were receiving chemotherapy with bevacizumab, ramucirumab, or aflibercept were enrolled. Variables related to the development of proteinuria were extracted from the patients' clinical records and used for regression analysis. The level of the proteinuria was evaluated based on CTCAE version 5. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for the development of proteinuria. The Wilcoxon/Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify significant differences between groups. Significant factors identified included systolic blood pressure (SBP) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.031, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.005-1.058; P = 0.0197], number of cycles (OR = 1.049, 95% CI = 1.018-1.082; P = 0.0019), and calcium channel blocker use (OR = 2.589, 95% CI = 1.090-6.146; P = 0.0311). There was no difference among the three anti-angiogenic agents (P = 0.4969) or among cancer types (P = 0.2726) in the likelihood of proteinuria. In conclusion, SBP, number of cycles, and calcium channel blocker use were identified as significant predictors of the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria. There was no difference among the three anti-angiogenic agents or among cancer types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kanbayashi et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Cancer (colon, gastric, breast, lung) (n=124). Calcium channel blocker use vs. No calcium channel blocker use was evaluated on Development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced proteinuria (OR 2.589, 95% CI 1.090-6.146, p=0.0311). Concomitant use of calcium channel blockers (OR 2.589), higher systolic blood pressure, and increased number of treatment cycles were identified as significant predictors for the development of proteinuria in cancer patients treated with anti-angiogenic agents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: