Key result
The binding association constant for ACE inhibitors was significantly higher in rat atrial preparations compared to lung (P<0.025) and ventricles (P<0.005).
p-value: p=<0.025
Differences in ACE binding association constants between cardiac and lung tissues appear to have limited biological significance in vivo following oral quinapril administration.
Atrial ACE affinity differences in rats have limited in vivo impact; hypothesis-generating for tissue-specific effects, no practice implications.
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) from the rat heart and lung was studied by use of the radioligand [125I]-351A. 2. Displacement of the bound radioinhibitor [125I]-351A was used to assess the relative potency of six ACE inhibitors in rat heart and lung homogenates and estimate the binding association constant (KA). 3. The KA for atrial preparations was significantly higher than that of the lung (P less than 0.025) and also the ventricles (P less than 0.005). Ventricular preparations and preparations from the lung also differed significantly (P less than 0.05). These differences in KA were noted for all six ACE inhibitors used to displace the radioligand. 4. The rank order of potency of the ACE inhibitors was quinaprilat = benazeprilat greater than perindoprilat greater than 351A greater than lisinopril greater than fosinoprilat. 5. Cardiac ACE inhibition was studied ex vivo following oral administration of quinapril to rats. Following 0.3 mg kg-1 quinapril, the time course and degree of inhibition of ventricular and atrial ACE were similar. 6. These results suggest that the detected differences in KA noted have only a limited potential biological significance. The difference in KA may reflect variations in the structure or conformation of ACE in different tissues.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabris et al. (1990) studied this question. Quinapril was evaluated on Binding association constant (KA) and ex vivo ACE inhibition (p=<0.025). The binding association constant for ACE inhibitors was significantly higher in rat atrial preparations compared to lung (P<0.025) and ventricles (P<0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: