Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Studies were carried out to investigate the relationship between extracellular Ca++ and the ability of a particular smooth muscle to develop tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II (AII). Stimulation of rat uterus by AII was found to be dependent on extracellular Ca++. Placing the tissue in 0 Ca++ completely blocked AII-induced contractions as did the presence of the "Ca++ antagonists" verapamil (10- minus 5M), SKF 525-A (10- MINUS 5M), tetracaine (10- minus 4M), Mn++ (8 times 10- minus 3M), or La-3+ (10- minus 3M). In addition, it is no longer possible to produce tachyphylaxis to AII in deplorazed rat uterus under conditions of pH and Ca++ concentration in which a normally polarized preparation would be unresponsive. Verapamil, on the other hand, was an even more effective antagonist of AII in depolarized preparations (ID50 of 10- minus 8M) than in normal tissues (ID50 of 2.0 times 10- minus 7M). Like the rat uterus, the smooth muscle of the guinea pig ileum also develops tachyphylaxis to AII, and the effect of this peptide was also blocked by 10- minus 5 M verapamil. Rabbit aorta, however, was found to be relatively resistant to both development of tachyphylaxis under conditions of low Ca++ and low pH and also to inhibition by even very high concentrations of verapamil (10- minus 4M). The results of these studies suggest that the Ca++ site involved in the tachyphylactic response to AII may be a physiologically important one in those smooth muscles in which movement of extracellular Ca++ contributes to the inward ion currents during excitation. Verapamil, however, appears to act at a common step in the excitation-contraction sequence in rat uterus. A working model of the interaction of AII with rat uterine smooth muscle is presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
RJ Freer (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: