Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper attempts to show that the acorn–oak tree argument against the slippery slope on the personhood of the fetus is valid and William Cooney's attack on this argument fails. I also argue that the slippery slope argument leads to on undesirable conclusion and should not be used as a valid tool in the debate on the personhood of the fetus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chenyang Li (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: