Why the study?
Does intensive follow-up of non-attenders in a cardiovascular risk reduction programme improve enrollment and identify different risk profiles compared to attenders?
Does intensive follow-up of non-attenders in a cardiovascular risk reduction programme improve enrollment and identify different risk profiles compared to attenders?
Intensive follow-up of non-attenders in a cardiovascular risk reduction program yields low enrollment, and non-attending women have higher smoking rates, highlighting the need to account for non-attendance in population health audits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Intensive follow-up yields low enrollment among non-attenders; leaves open optimal strategies to engage high-risk smokers in cardiovascular prevention.
Davies et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: