Key result
Preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg was independently associated with decreased amputation-free survival at one year following lower extremity bypass (HR 2.30, P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg predict decreased amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass?
Cohort (n=240)
No
Does preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg predict decreased amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass?
Preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg is an independent predictor of decreased amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass, highlighting the prognostic value of arterial stiffness.
Preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg was associated with worse amputation-free survival after bypass; leaves open its utility for risk stratification in PAD.
Increased pulse pressure reflects pathologic arterial stiffening and predicts cardiovascular events and mortality. The effect of pulse pressure on outcomes in lower extremity bypass patients remains unknown. We thus investigated whether preoperative pulse pressure could predict amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for atherosclerotic occlusive disease. An institutional database identified 240 included patients undergoing lower extremity bypass from 2005 to 2014. Preoperative demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, operative factors, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded, and compared between patients with pulse pressures above and below 80 mm Hg. Factors were analyzed in bi- and multivariable models to assess independent predictors of amputation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the temporal effect of pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg on amputation-free survival. Patients with a pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg were older, male, and had higher systolic and lower diastolic pressures. Patients with pulse pressure <80 mm Hg demonstrated a survival advantage on Kaplan-Meier analysis at six months (log-rank P = 0.003) and one year (P = 0.005) postoperatively. In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for decreased amputation-free survival at six months included nonwhite race, tissue loss, infrapopliteal target, and preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg (hazard ratio 2.60; P = 0.02), while only tissue loss and pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg (hazard ratio 2.30, P = 0.02) remained predictive at one year. Increased pulse pressure is independently associated with decreased amputation-free survival in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass. Further efforts to understand the relationship between increased arterial stiffness and poor outcomes in these patients are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wise et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic occlusive disease requiring lower extremity bypass (n=240). Preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg vs. Preoperative pulse pressure <80 mm Hg was evaluated on Amputation-free survival at one year (HR 2.30, p=0.02). Preoperative pulse pressure ≥80 mm Hg was independently associated with decreased amputation-free survival at one year following lower extremity bypass (HR 2.30, P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: