Key result
Higher helical flow intensity showed a moderate but non-significant inverse correlation with adverse time-averaged wall shear stress area in diseased patient-specific coronary bifurcations (r=-0.62, p=0.12).
Why the study?
Helical flow has shown protective vascular effects in other vessels, but its role in patient-specific human coronary arteries required further investigation in healthy and diseased bifurcations.
Does helical flow intensity correlate with adverse hemodynamics in healthy and diseased patient-specific coronary bifurcations?
Does helical flow intensity correlate with adverse hemodynamics in healthy and diseased patient-specific coronary bifurcations?
Helical flow intensity is higher in diseased coronary bifurcations and shows a weak to moderate inverse correlation with adverse wall shear stress, suggesting it may have a protective effect and potential as a biomarker.
Helical flow metrics should not yet guide clinical decisions; leaves open potential protective role pending larger studies.
Helical flow (HF) exists in healthy and diseased coronary bifurcations and was found to have a protective atherosclerotic vascular effect in other vessels. However, the role of HF in patient-specific human coronary arteries still needs further study, and is therefore the objective of this study in both healthy and diseased bifurcations. Computational studies were conducted on 16 patient-specific coronary bifurcations, including eight healthy and eight identical cases with idealized narrowing to represent disease. In general, higher HF intensity may have a favorable effect as it corelated to the reduction of the percentage vessel area exposed to adverse time averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS%) in both healthy and diseased models. The HF intensity and distribution of each model varies due to the complex shape of patient-specific models. The presence of disease appears to have an important impact on the downstream HF patterns and the TAWSS distributions. Clinical Relevance- By understanding the relationship between HF and hemodynamics, HF may be used as a predictor for the formation and progression of atherosclerotic plaque in coronary arteries instead of near-wall WSS measures, which can be determined with higher accuracy in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2022) studied Coronary artery disease (n=16). Helical flow vs. Low helical flow was evaluated on Correlation between entire volume helical flow intensity (h2) and adverse time-averaged wall shear stress area (TAWSS%) in diseased models (r=-0.62, p=0.12). Higher helical flow intensity showed a moderate but non-significant inverse correlation with adverse time-averaged wall shear stress area in diseased patient-specific coronary bifurcations (r=-0.62, p=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: