Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mark Lange has defended the view that mathematical explanation and grounding explanation diverge. In this paper, I argue that at least one type of grounding relation is immune to his criticisms. After fixing a minimal separatist theory of ground, I show that his arguments mostly rely on another thesis about grounding (I’ll call it “atomic grounding thesis”), which is not supported. Furthermore, a second attempt at using purity is not entirely satisfactory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammad Maarefi (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: