Key result
Twelve weeks of CSRT-HIIT significantly improved cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in untrained young men, but demonstrated no statistically significant differences compared to traditional TRT-HIIT.
Why the study?
To investigate the impact of cluster set resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training on the body composition, cardiovascular, and muscular fitness of untrained young men.
Does cluster set resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (CSRT-HIIT) improve cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness more than traditional TRT-HIIT in untrained young men?
RCT (n=22)
Single-blind
computer-generated randomization sequence
No
Does cluster set resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (CSRT-HIIT) improve cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness more than traditional TRT-HIIT in untrained young men?
p-value: p=>0.05
Both cluster set resistance training and traditional resistance training, when combined with high-intensity interval training, are equally effective in significantly improving cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in untrained young men.
CSRT-HIIT matches TRT-HIIT for fitness gains in untrained men; confirms equivalent efficacy of cluster-set protocols in combined training.
Objective This study aims to investigate the impact of cluster set resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (CSRT-HIIT) on the body composition, cardiovascular and muscular fitness of untrained young men. Methods Twenty-two participants were randomly assigned to the CSRT-HIIT or traditional resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (TRT-HIIT). Both groups had cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness measured before and after the intervention. Results Compared to the baseline, significant increases were observed in the 1RM weights for squat, bench press, deadlift, and rowing, as well as the maximum training volume at 70% 1RM, maximum oxygen uptake, standing long jump, and the thickness of the pectoralis major, biceps brachii, and rectus femoris in both the CSRT-HIIT and TRT-HIIT groups after the intervention, with a significant decrease in body fat percentage ( P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for these variables ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Twelve weeks of both CSRT-HIIT and TRT-HIIT significantly improved cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in untrained young men, demonstrating that the novel CSRT-HIIT is an equally effective alternative to traditional TRT-HIIT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Sedentary behavior / Untrained individuals (n=22). Cluster set resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (CSRT-HIIT) vs. Traditional resistance training combined with high-intensity interval training (TRT-HIIT) was evaluated on Between-group differences in cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness (including VO2 max and 1RM strength) from baseline to 12 weeks (p=>0.05). Twelve weeks of CSRT-HIIT significantly improved cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness in untrained young men, but demonstrated no statistically significant differences compared to traditional TRT-HIIT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: