Key result
AVR for RHD shows reduced LV apical rotation and torsion at six months versus controls.
Why the study?
This study aimed to assess endocardial, epicardial, and global myocardial rotation and torsion using 2D-STI in patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent AVR.
Are there differences in left ventricular rotation and torsion measured by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in patients 6 months after rheumatic aortic valve replacement compared to normal controls?
Observational (n=67)
Are there differences in left ventricular rotation and torsion measured by 2D speckle tracking echocardiography in patients 6 months after rheumatic aortic valve replacement compared to normal controls?
p-value: p=0.006, 0.003, 0.003
2D speckle tracking echocardiography demonstrates that while basal left ventricular rotation recovers 6 months after rheumatic aortic valve replacement, apical rotation and overall torsion remain significantly reduced compared to healthy controls.
May indicate incomplete LV recovery after rheumatic AVR; cross-sectional data leaves open prognostic value of torsion.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the rotation and torsion in the endocardial, epicardial, and global myocardium using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging(2D-STI) in patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods: This study included 42 AVR patients [(23 F/19 M, aged (62.7±11.2) years] and 25 normal control [(16 F/9 M, aged (63.3±10.5) years]. 2D-STI was performed in five consecutive heart beats, and data were stored for offline analysis using Q-Lab. The peak systolic rotation of the endocardial, epicardial, and global myocardium in the left ventricular basal and apical walls were measured using 2D-STI. The torsion and twisting angles of the sub-endocardial, sub-epicardial, and global myocardium were calculated. Results: Rotation at the left ventricular basal level of the study group was not significantly reduced compared with that in the normal control group. However, at the apical level, rotation was significantly reduced (p=0.03, 0.003, 0.004). The torsion angle of the study group was significantly reduced compared with that of the normal control group (p=0.006, 0.003, 0.003). Furthermore, patients with different left ventricular ejection function after AVR showed differences in torsion of the endocardial, epicardial, and global myocardium. Conclusions: The systolic rotation and twist of the subendocardial, sub-epicardial, and global myocardium in the left ventricle were reduced, whereas those at the basal level remained unchanged. After AVR, old patients have an almost complete recovery of left ventricular rotational motion at the basal level. 2D-STI is a useful non-invasive tool for evaluation of the left ventricular regional function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lou et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Rheumatic heart disease post-aortic valve replacement (n=67). Aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease vs. Normal controls was evaluated on Peak systolic rotation and torsion angles of the left ventricle (p=0.006, 0.003, 0.003). Six months after aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease, left ventricular apical rotation and torsion angles were significantly reduced compared to normal controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: