Key result
The RMSSD-Slope decreased as exercise intensity increased (average 2.65 at 60%, 1.25 at 75%, and 0.75 at 100% intensity) and progressively decreased after consecutive matches.
Why the study?
Training load control is an important area of sports investigation, but few tools exist to assess internal training load.
Does RMSSD-Slope accurately assess internal training load in different sports situations?
Observational (n=74)
Does RMSSD-Slope accurately assess internal training load in different sports situations?
RMSSD-Slope may support training-load monitoring in athletes; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
The control of training load has become a very interesting field for investigation in sports, but few tools are used to assess internal training load (ITL). The aim of this study is to use a post-exercise analysis methodology in different athletes and situations to establish its utility and reliability as a measure of ITL. In a retrospective review, we analysed 112 measurements of 74 subjects (38 men and 36 women) grouped in: University students (UNI); national team (FUTSAL 1); university team (FUTSAL 2); athletes (ATL); badminton players (BADM). Measures of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) were made with a Polar V800 with a thoracic band H10, during 5 minutes in a seated position after exercise. We calculated the Root Mean Square of the successive differences between adjacent RR intervals (RMSSD) and its slope from exercise to recovery. Measurements from UNI, FUTSAL-2, ATL-M and ATL-F were grouped into three categories of intensity (60%, 75% and 100%). RMSSD-Slope values were lower as intensity increased but different for every subject. In the BADM and FUTSAL-1 groups, RMSSD-Slope was progressively lower after consecutive matches for every player. The RMSSD-Slope seems to be a very accurate method to assess ITL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruso-Álvarez et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Healthy athletes and physically active students (n=74). Exercise intensity vs. Different exercise intensities (60%, 75%, 100%) was evaluated on RMSSD-Slope during recovery. The RMSSD-Slope decreased as exercise intensity increased (average 2.65 at 60%, 1.25 at 75%, and 0.75 at 100% intensity) and progressively decreased after consecutive matches.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: