Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We propose that doping be legalized under medical supervision. First, we discuss two motivations for allowing medically supervised doping. We reject the ‘compromised choice/harm minimization’ motivation as unlikely to win the support of athletes. We agree that it could lead to an arms race. Instead, we favor full acceptance of doping under medical supervision and answer Reid’s spirit of sport objection to medical manipulation. After presenting a set of guiding principles, we use them to answer the arms race objection and rebut one of the most prominent objections in the literature about the safety of medically supervised doping, the game-theoretic objection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moore et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: