Intact washed human platelets aggregated in response to paf-acether (paf) and did not metabolize [3H]paf at concentrations up to 10 nM. However, when platelets were lysed by exposure to pH 9.5, resulting in 37.5 +/- 2.5% (mean +/- SD, n = 3) lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) release, 20.5 +/- 5.7% of the radioactivity was detected as labeled lyso paf and 5.7 +/- 3.1% as labeled alkylacylglycerophosphocholine. When platelets were aggregated with 0.5 IU/mL thrombin or high concentrations of paf (100 nM), they released a part of their acetylhydrolase without releasing LDH. In supernatants obtained from aggregated platelets, 21 +/- 2% or 10 +/- 2% (n = 3), respectively, of the total platelet acetylhydrolase activity was detected vs. none in supernatants of resting cells. The release of acetylhydrolase was concentration- and time-dependent and paralleled the release of PF 4, a marker for alpha-granules. The acetylhydrolase affinity for paf (Km) measured in sonicates of resting and thrombin-activated platelets was 8.3 +/- 1.5 microM vs. 10.6 +/- 1.5 microM, n = 5, n.s. in a "Mann Whitney" test. The latter Km was slightly but significantly different (P < 0.05, n = 5) from that of the thrombin-released acetylhydrolase (7.9 +/- 1.5 microM) and that of the latter was itself different from plasma acetylhydrolase (5.3 +/- 0.5, P < 0.05, n = 5). Addition of plasma (acid-treated to inactivate acetylhydrolase) decreased the Km value of supernatant acetylhydrolase to 6.1 +/- 1.4 microM. All preparations of acetylhydrolase exhibited similar pH requirements and sensitivity to various inhibitors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korth et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: