Key result
Remote KCCQ score <25 post-MI linked to ~6-fold higher all-cause mortality vs score ≥50.
Why the study?
Heart failure is a common complication after MI linked to increased mortality, but whether remote heart failure symptom assessment improves risk stratification is unknown.
Does remote assessment of heart failure symptoms using the KCCQ 1 month after discharge predict mortality in patients post-myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=1,135)
No
Does remote assessment of heart failure symptoms using the KCCQ 1 month after discharge predict mortality in patients post-myocardial infarction?
Remote evaluation of heart failure symptoms via the KCCQ 1 month post-myocardial infarction independently identifies patients at heightened risk of mortality and improves risk stratification over established clinical scores.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote KCCQ assessment may flag high-mortality-risk post-MI patients; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before guiding care.
Background Heart failure is a common complication after myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with increased mortality. Whether remote heart failure symptoms assessment after MI can improve risk stratification is unknown. The authors evaluated the association of the 23‐item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) with all‐cause mortality after MI. Methods and Results Prospectively collected data from consecutive patients hospitalized for MI at a large tertiary heart center between June 2017 and September 2022 were used. Patients remotely completed the KCCQ 1 month after discharge. A total of 1135 (aged 64±12 years, 26.7% women) of 1721 eligible patients completed the KCCQ. Ranges of KCCQ scores revealed that 30 (2.6%), 114 (10.0%), 274 (24.1%), and 717 (63.2%) had scores <25, 25 to 49, 50 to 74, and ≥75, respectively. During a mean follow‐up of 46 months (interquartile range, 29–61), 146 (12.9%) died. In a fully adjusted analysis, KCCQ scores <50 were independently associated with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 6.05 for KCCQ <25, HR, 2.66 for KCCQ 25–49 versus KCCQ ≥50; both P <0.001). Adding the 30‐day KCCQ to clinical risk factors improved risk stratification: change in area under the curve of 2.6 (95% CI, 0.3–5.0), Brier score of −0.6 (95% CI, −1.0 to −0.2), and net reclassification improvement of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.45–1.04). KCCQ items most strongly associated with mortality were walking impairment, leg swelling, and change in symptoms. Conclusions Remote evaluation of heart failure symptoms using the KCCQ among patients recently discharged for MI identifies patients at risk for mortality. Whether closer follow‐up and targeted therapy can reduce mortality in high‐risk patients warrants further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wohlfahrt et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Myocardial Infarction (n=1,135). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score <25 vs. KCCQ score ≥50 was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 6.05, p=<0.001). A very poor health status (KCCQ score <25) assessed remotely 1 month after myocardial infarction was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 6.05) compared to a score ≥50.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: