Key result
Carotid atherosclerosis severity was increased in atherothrombotic and lacunar infarction patients compared to nonstroke patients, but similar in cardioembolic infarction and cerebral hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Is earlier carotid atherosclerosis associated with the risk for specific stroke subtypes?
Is earlier carotid atherosclerosis associated with the risk for specific stroke subtypes?
Earlier stages of carotid atherosclerosis may help in risk assessment specifically for atherothrombotic and lacunar infarctions, rather than cardioembolic or hemorrhagic strokes.
May support subtype-specific carotid imaging for atherothrombotic/lacunar risk; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
In addition to advanced stenosis, earlier stages of carotid atherosclerosis are associated with the risk for stroke. Based on a recent report, this review will focus on the associations between carotid atherosclerosis and stroke subtypes. The authors report increased severity of carotid atherosclerosis in atherothrombotic and lacunar infarction patients, compared to nonstroke patients. However, the severity was similar between nonstroke patients and those with cardioembolic infarction and cerebral hemorrhage. By receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, although evaluation of carotid atherosclerosis appears to help for risk assessment of atherothrombotic and lacunar infarction, the potential for benefit may be greater for atherothrombotic. Large prospective studies are still necessary to establish the link between earlier carotid atherosclerosis and the future risk for specific stroke subtypes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagai et al. (2003) conducted a review in Stroke and its subtypes. Carotid atherosclerosis vs. Nonstroke patients was evaluated on Stroke subtypes. Carotid atherosclerosis severity was increased in atherothrombotic and lacunar infarction patients compared to nonstroke patients, but similar in cardioembolic infarction and cerebral hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: