Key result
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate and reproducible assessment of cardiac valve morphology, function, and ventricular impact, offering significant added value over conventional diagnostic modalities.
Why the study?
What is the usefulness and added value of cardiovascular MRI in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease compared to conventional diagnostic means?
What is the usefulness and added value of cardiovascular MRI in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease compared to conventional diagnostic means?
Cardiovascular MRI is a valuable, accurate, and reproducible imaging modality for the assessment and management of valvular heart disease, complementing traditional echocardiography.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May complement echocardiography for valvular assessment; leaves open whether adoption improves outcomes in prospective studies.
Although ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of cardiac-related morbidity and mortality in the industrialized countries, a growing number of mainly elderly patients will experience a problem of valvular heart disease (VHD), often requiring surgical intervention at some stage. Doppler-echocardiography is the most popular imaging modality used in the evaluation of this disease entity. It encompasses, however, some non-negligible constraints which may hamper the quality and thus the interpretation of the exam. Cardiac catheterization has been considered for a long time the reference technique in this field, however, this technique is invasive and considered far from optimal. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is already considered an established diagnostic method for studying ventricular dimensions, function and mass. With improvement of MRI soft- and hardware, the assessment of cardiac valve function has also turned out to be fast, accurate and reproducible. This review focuses on the usefulness of MRI in the diagnosis and management of VHD, pointing out its added value in comparison with more conventional diagnostic means.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masci et al. (2007) conducted a review in Valvular heart disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) vs. Doppler-echocardiography and cardiac catheterization was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging provides accurate and reproducible assessment of cardiac valve morphology, function, and ventricular impact, offering significant added value over conventional diagnostic modalities.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: