Key result
Once-weekly exenatide reduces composite renal events ~13% vs. placebo in type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
To assess whether a previously developed multivariable risk prediction framework (PRE score) could predict the renal effects observed in the EXSCEL trial using short-term changes in cardio-renal risk markers.
Can short-term changes in cardio-renal risk markers predict the long-term renal effects of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes?
RCT (n=14,752)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Can short-term changes in cardio-renal risk markers predict the long-term renal effects of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Hazard Ratio: 0.87 (95% CI 0.73–0.99)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.7% vs 7.4%
p-value: p=0.03
Integrating short-term risk marker changes into a multivariable risk score accurately predicted the magnitude of long-term renal risk reduction with exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Short-term risk-marker changes accurately predict exenatide renal benefit in type 2 diabetes; supports PRE score but leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
AIM: To assess whether the previously developed multivariable risk prediction framework (PRE score) could predict the renal effects observed in the EXSCEL cardiovascular outcomes trial using short-term changes in cardio-renal risk markers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Changes from baseline to 6 months in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), haemoglobin, total cholesterol, and new micro- or macroalbuminuria were evaluated. The renal outcomes were defined as a composite of a sustained 30% or 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Relationships between risk markers and long-term renal outcomes were determined in patients with type 2 diabetes from the ALTITUDE study using multivariable Cox regression analysis, and then applied to short-term changes in risk markers observed in EXSCEL to predict the exenatide-induced impact on renal outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, mean HbA1c, BMI, SBP and total cholesterol were lower at 6 months with exenatide, as was the incidence of new microalbuminuria. The PRE score predicted a relative risk reduction for the 30% eGFR decline + ESRD endpoint of 11.3% (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.94), compared with 12.7% (HR 0.87; 0.77-0.99) observed risk reduction. For the 40% eGFR decline + ESRD endpoint, the predicted and observed risk reductions were 11.0% (HR 0.89; 0.82-0.97) and 13.7% (HR 0.86, 0.72-1.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating short-term risk marker changes into a multivariable risk score predicted the magnitude of renal risk reduction observed in EXSCEL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Idzerda et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Type 2 Diabetes (n=14,752). Exenatide vs. Placebo was evaluated on Composite renal outcome of ≥30% decline in eGFR or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.73-0.99, p=0.03). In patients with type 2 diabetes, once-weekly exenatide significantly reduced the risk of a composite renal outcome of ≥30% eGFR decline or ESRD by 13% (HR 0.87) compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: