Key result
Impaired renal function, assessed by creatinine, eGFR, and cystatin C, was not significantly associated with Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in adult outpatients.
Why the study?
Is there a correlation between Lipoprotein(a) levels and biochemical markers of renal function in adult outpatients?
Observational (n=150)
Is there a correlation between Lipoprotein(a) levels and biochemical markers of renal function in adult outpatients?
Lipoprotein(a) levels do not correlate with biochemical markers of renal function in a general outpatient population, suggesting that routine Lp(a) interpretation does not require adjustment for mild-to-moderate renal impairment.
May not require Lp(a) adjustment for mild-moderate renal impairment in outpatients; leaves open effects in severe CKD or other populations.
Context. —Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is receiving major emphasis as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Results of studies on Lp(a) in patients with impaired renal function are contradictory, and no information is available on the association between Lp(a) and estimated glomerular filtration rate and cystatin C. Objective. —To evaluate the potential relationships among the biochemical markers creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and cystatin C and their association with Lp(a) in patients with impaired renal function. Design. —We performed a retrospective analysis using the database of our laboratory to retrieve results of Lp(a), creatinine, and cystatin C tests performed on consecutive outpatients referred by general practitioners for routine blood testing during the last year. Results. —Cumulative results for all of the above-mentioned variables were retrieved for 150 adults older than 35 years. After stratifying Lp(a) values according to thresholds of creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and cystatin C, no significant differences in Lp(a) concentration were observed in subjects with abnormal values of these biochemical markers. The prevalence of Lp(a) values greater than or equal to 300 mg/L was not significantly different in subjects with biochemical markers suggestive of impaired renal function, as compared with those without such markers. In multivariable linear regression analysis, none of the parameters tested was significantly associated with Lp(a). Conclusions. —We suggest that unless renal function is completely compromised, measurement of biochemical markers of renal function might be relatively unimportant to improve clinical usefulness of Lp(a) testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lippi et al. (2008) conducted an observational in General population outpatients (n=150). Impaired renal function vs. Normal renal function was evaluated on Lipoprotein(a) concentration. Impaired renal function, assessed by creatinine, eGFR, and cystatin C, was not significantly associated with Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in adult outpatients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: