Key result
Early aggressive diuresis fails to reduce hospital length of stay in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Previous studies comparing aggressive versus nonaggressive diuresis on outcomes in hospitalized CHF patients have shown contradicting results, and specific guidelines to direct diuretic therapy are lacking.
Does early aggressive diuresis reduce hospital length of stay in patients admitted with acute congestive heart failure?
Cohort (n=194)
No
Does early aggressive diuresis reduce hospital length of stay in patients admitted with acute congestive heart failure?
Early aggressive diuresis (≥2400 mL urine output in the first 24 hours) does not significantly reduce hospital length of stay in patients admitted with acute congestive heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Early aggressive diuresis was not associated with shorter LOS in acute HF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background: Diuresis is the mainstay of treatment during hospitalization for patients admitted with congestive heart failure (CHF). Hospital length of stay (LOS) is considered an important patient outcome for CHF patients; previous studies comparing higher rates of diuresis (aggressive) versus relatively lower rates (nonaggressive) on patient outcomes have shown contradicting results. In fact, no specific guidelines to direct diuretic therapy exist. This investigation was designed to study the effect of early aggressive diuresis on hospital LOS. Methods: Data from 194 CHF patients (admitted to the hospital for 1 year) were collected and analyzed in a retrospective cohort study design. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on urine output achieved in the first 24 h of admission; the aggressive diuresis cohort (urine output ≥2400 mL) comprised of 29 subjects while the nonaggressive diuresis cohort (urine output ≤2400 mL) had 165 subjects. The primary endpoint was LOS. Results: Median LOS for the aggressive diuresis cohort was 4 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.95–5.06) as compared to 5 days (95% CI 4.40–5.60) for the nonaggressive diuresis cohort; log-rank test showed no significant differences between the hospitalized proportions between the two cohorts over time ( P = 0.67). Conclusion: Hospital LOS for CHF patients treated with early aggressive diuresis was not significantly different compared to patients treated with nonaggressive diuresis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butt et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Congestive Heart Failure (n=194). Early aggressive diuresis (≥2400 mL urine output in first 24 hours) vs. Nonaggressive diuresis (≤2400 mL urine output in first 24 hours) was evaluated on Hospital length of stay (LOS) (HR 1.12, p=0.67). Early aggressive diuresis did not significantly reduce hospital length of stay compared to nonaggressive diuresis in patients admitted with acute congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: