Key result
An automated unsupervised algorithm using Greedy Snakes for abdominal fat quantification on CT images achieved a 3.4% error for visceral adipose tissue segmentation compared to manual segmentation.
Why the study?
Does an automated unsupervised algorithm using Greedy Snakes accurately quantify abdominal fat from CT images compared to manual segmentation in patients with a wide BMI range?
Does an automated unsupervised algorithm using Greedy Snakes accurately quantify abdominal fat from CT images compared to manual segmentation in patients with a wide BMI range?
An automated unsupervised algorithm using Greedy Snakes can accurately quantify visceral adipose tissue from abdominal CT images with a low error rate compared to manual segmentation, potentially aiding in obesity-related risk assessment.
May enable automated VAT quantification on CT; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Adipose tissue has been associated with adverse consequences of obesity. Total adipose tissue (TAT) is divided into subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Intra-abdominal fat (VAT), located inside the abdominal cavity, is a major factor for the classic obesity related pathologies. Since direct measurement of visceral and subcutaneous fat is not trivial, substitute metrics like waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) are used in clinical settings to quantify obesity. Abdominal fat can be assessed effectively using CT or MRI, but manual fat segmentation is rather subjective and time-consuming. Hence, an automatic and accurate quantification tool for abdominal fat is needed. The goal of this study is to extract TAT, VAT and SAT fat from abdominal CT in a fully automated unsupervised fashion using energy minimization techniques. We applied a four step framework consisting of 1) initial body contour estimation, 2) approximation of the body contour, 3) estimation of inner abdominal contour using Greedy Snakes algorithm, and 4) voting, to segment the subcutaneous and visceral fat. We validated our algorithm on 952 clinical abdominal CT images (from 476 patients with a very wide BMI range) collected from various radiology departments of Geisinger Health System. To our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind on such a large and diverse clinical dataset. Our algorithm obtained a 3.4% error for VAT segmentation compared to manual segmentation. These personalized and accurate measurements of fat can complement traditional population health driven obesity metrics such as BMI and WC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agarwal et al. (2017) studied Obesity (n=476). Automated unsupervised fat quantification algorithm using Greedy Snakes vs. Manual segmentation was evaluated on VAT segmentation error. An automated unsupervised algorithm using Greedy Snakes for abdominal fat quantification on CT images achieved a 3.4% error for visceral adipose tissue segmentation compared to manual segmentation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: