Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: This study compared the acute time-course effects of a Multi-dimensional Elastic Band (MEB) activation protocol versus a traditional Heavy Barbell Squat (HBS) protocol on lower limb explosive performance, aiming to identify optimal recovery windows. Methods: Sixteen trained male athletes (age: 19 ± 0.9 yrs) participated in a randomized crossover study consisting of three sessions: Control, HBS (4 reps at 90% 1RM), and MEB (continuous vertical jumps against elastic resistance). Countermovement jump (CMJ) height and Peak Power Output (PPO) were measured at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 minutes post-activation. Results: pairwise comparisons did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05), while effect size analysis (HBS and MEB vs. Control at each time point) indicated practical improvements. The MEB protocol induced a rapid potentiation response, demonstrating moderate effect sizes in CMJ height and PPO as early as 3 minutes post-activation. In contrast, the HBS protocol exhibited delayed potentiation, with improvements appearing only after 9 minutes, likely due to residual fatigue. Conclusion: Multi-dimensional elastic resistance is a time-efficient alternative for inducing Post-activation Performance Enhancement (PAPE), offering a rapid onset of practical potentiation (within 3 min) based on effect size analysis. These findings suggest MEB is particularly suitable for pre-competition warm-ups where recovery time is severely constrained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: