Key result
High ACEF score linked to ~5.3-fold higher MACE risk in MINOCA.
Why the study?
Risk stratification in patients with MINOCA is poorly understood, prompting evaluation of the ACEF score for predicting long-term outcomes.
Does an elevated ACEF score predict long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)?
Cohort (n=1,179)
No
Does an elevated ACEF score predict long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)?
The ACEF score serves as a simple, effective prognostic tool for risk stratifying patients with MINOCA to identify those at high risk for adverse outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about risk stratification in patients with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA). We investigated whether the age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score (age [years]/ejection fraction [%] + 1 [if creatinine >176 μmol/L]) might predict long-term outcomes after MINOCA. HYPOTHESIS: The ACEF score enables accurate risk prediction in patients with MINOCA. METHODS: A total of 1179 patients with MINOCA were enrolled and divided based on their ACEF score tertile levels. The primary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed. Discrimination was defined as the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: During the median follow-up of 41.7 months, patients with MINOCA with higher ACEF score tertiles had a significantly higher incidence of MACE (6.3%, 12.5%, and 23.8%, respectively; p < .001). The adjusted risk of MACE increased with the rising ACEF score tertiles (1st tertile as reference; 2nd tertile: HR 2.70, 95% CI: 1.38-5.29, p = .004; and 3rd tertile: HR 5.35, 95% CI: 2.72-10.51, p < .001). Moreover, an elevated ACEF score was closely associated with an increased risk of MACE overall (HR 4.23, 95% CI: 3.37-5.30, p < .001) and in subgroups (all p < .05). The ACEF score also yielded a good predictive value (AUC 0.79) for MACE. CONCLUSION: Elevated ACEF scores were strongly associated with a poor prognosis after MINOCA. This simple and valid risk score may facilitate risk stratification and decision making in the population with MINOCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) (n=1,179). Elevated ACEF score (Age, Creatinine, and Ejection Fraction) vs. Low ACEF score (1st tertile) was evaluated on Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure (HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.72-10.51, p=<0.001). An elevated ACEF score in the highest tertile was associated with a more than 5-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to the lowest tertile (HR 5.35, 95% CI 2.72-10.51, p<0.001) in patients with MINOCA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: