Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For most versions of the Stroop test, there are no available estimations of reliability. In the present study, “XXXXX” strings, conflicting color words, taboo words, self-relevant words, and control words were used as irrelevant stimuli. Test-retest reliability of the response times was quite high. However, taboo interferences (difference between response times on taboo and control words) and self-relevant interferences were not reliable. A principal-components analysis showed that one principal component explained most of the total variance of the different Stroop tasks. Therefore, participants' ability to ignore irrelevant stimuli is independent of the semantic meaning of the stimuli.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Siegrist (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: