Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigate whether a recently proposed large source of CH 4 from vegetation can be reconciled with atmospheric measurements. Atmospheric transport model simulations with and without vegetation emissions are compared with background CH 4 , δ 13 C‐CH 4 and satellite measurements. For present–day CH 4 we derive an upper limit to the newly discovered source of 125 Tg CH 4 yr −1 . Analysis of preindustrial CH 4 , however, points to 85 Tg CH 4 yr −1 as a more plausible limit. Model calculations with and without vegetation emissions show strikingly similar results at background surface monitoring sites, indicating that these measurements are rather insensitive to CH 4 from plants. Simulations with 125 Tg CH 4 yr −1 vegetation emissions can explain up to 50% of the previously reported unexpectedly high CH 4 column abundances over tropical forests observed by SCIAMACHY. Our results confirm the potential importance of vegetation emissions, and call for further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Houweling et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: