Key result
Individualized aerobic training at the ventilatory threshold significantly improved VO2max by 20% compared to standardized training at 50% of heart rate reserve in elderly subjects (p < .05).
Why the study?
Does an individualized training program at the ventilatory threshold improve VO2max in elderly subjects compared to a standardized training program at 50% of heart rate reserve?
Does an individualized training program at the ventilatory threshold improve VO2max in elderly subjects compared to a standardized training program at 50% of heart rate reserve?
p-value: p=< .05
Individualized aerobic training at the ventilatory threshold is more effective than standardized training at 50% heart rate reserve for improving VO2max in elderly subjects.
May support individualized ventilatory threshold training for elderly VO2max gains; leaves open confirmation in larger RCTs before practice change.
This study was designed to specify whether an individualized training program at the ventilatory threshold in elderly subjects produces greater training adaptations than a standardized training program performed at 50% of heart rate reserve. Sixteen subjects participated in the study. Maximal exercise tests were performed on a treadmill before and after the training program. Eight subjects trained at the ventilatory threshold (ITG) and eight trained at 50% of heart rate reserve (STG). The mean training heart rate was 129 +/- 14.2 bpm and 115 +/- 7.9 bpm in the individualized training group (ITG) and the standardized training group (STG), respectively. The maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) was improved significantly by 20% in ITG (within group p < .05), whereas no significant improvement was noted in STG. The improvement in ITG compared to the nonsignificant change in STG was significant (p < .05). In addition, submaximal ventilation and heart rate were more decreased in ITG than STG. We conclude that for elderly people an individualized training program at the level of the ventilatory threshold is significantly more effective in terms of VO2max and submaximal cardiorespiratory adaptations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fabre et al. (1997) studied Elderly (n=16). Individualized training program at the ventilatory threshold vs. Standardized training program performed at 50% of heart rate reserve was evaluated on Maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) (p=< .05). Individualized aerobic training at the ventilatory threshold significantly improved VO2max by 20% compared to standardized training at 50% of heart rate reserve in elderly subjects (p < .05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: