Key result
Acute coronary syndrome was associated with a higher unadjusted 1-year rate of death or myocardial infarction compared to stable coronary disease after everolimus-eluting stent implantation, but this difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted HR 1.260).
Why the study?
The long-term safety of first-generation DES in ACS was controversial, prompting the need for 5-year real-world efficacy and safety data for second-generation DES in Japanese ACS patients.
Does everolimus-eluting stent implantation have similar long-term efficacy and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to those with stable coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,899)
Yes
Does everolimus-eluting stent implantation have similar long-term efficacy and safety in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to those with stable coronary artery disease?
Hazard Ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 0.774–2.053)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.4% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=0.352
Everolimus-eluting stents demonstrate comparable long-term safety and efficacy in patients with acute coronary syndrome versus stable coronary artery disease over a 5-year follow-up period.
Adjusted 1-year death or MI rates similar after everolimus-eluting stents in ACS versus stable disease; observational data leave residual confounding open.
Background . The long-term safety of first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was controversial. Purpose . The purpose of this study was to establish 5-year real-world data regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of second-generation DES in Japanese patients with ACS. Methods . The Tokyo-MD PCI study is a multicenter, observational cohort study enrolling consecutive patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation. The 5-year clinical events were compared between the ACS group ( n = 644) and the stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) group ( n = 1255). The primary efficacy endpoint was ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR), and the primary safety endpoint was the composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI). Results . The median follow-up duration was 5.4 years. The cumulative incidence of ischemia-driven TLR was similar between ACS and SCAD (1 year: 3.0% versus 2.7%; P=0.682, 1–5 years: 2.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.864). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death or MI within 1 year was significantly higher in ACS than in SCAD (7.4% versus 3.8%; P<0.001); however, ACS did not increase the risk of all-cause death or MI after adjusting confounders (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.260; 95% confidence interval, 0.774–2.053; P=0.352). From 1 to 5 years, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death or MI was not significantly different between ACS and SCAD (11.6% versus 11.4%; P=0.706). The cumulative incidence of very late stent thrombosis was low and similar between ACS and SCAD (0.2% versus 0.2%; P=0.942). Conclusion . This real-world registry suggested that EES has comparable long-term efficacy and safety in patients with ACS and SCAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshikawa et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) (n=1,899). Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vs. Stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (safety endpoint) at 1 year (adjusted HR 1.260, 95% CI 0.774-2.053, p=0.352). Acute coronary syndrome was associated with a higher unadjusted 1-year rate of death or myocardial infarction compared to stable coronary disease after everolimus-eluting stent implantation, but this difference was not significant after adjusting for confounders (adjusted HR 1.260).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: