Key result
A 4-week long-HIIT program improves maximal oxygen uptake but fails to increase anaerobic capacity.
Why the study?
Long-HIIT is often used for cardiorespiratory adaptations but can also challenge anaerobic and neuromuscular systems, prompting investigation into its effects on anaerobic capacity, repeated sprint ability, and neuromuscular function.
Does a 4-week long-HIIT program improve anaerobic capacity, repeated sprint ability, and neuromuscular function in healthy active men?
Does a 4-week long-HIIT program improve anaerobic capacity, repeated sprint ability, and neuromuscular function in healthy active men?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.34
Absolute Event Rate: 3.85% vs 3.7%
p-value: p=0.22
A 4-week long-HIIT program improves maximal aerobic power but does not significantly alter anaerobic capacity or neuromuscular function in healthy active men.
4-week long-HIIT improves aerobic but not anaerobic capacity or neuromuscular resistance in active men; leaves open optimal duration and populations for anaerobic gains.
Purpose: High-intensity long-interval training (long-HIIT; interval≥1 min; intensity 85%-100% of maximal oxygen uptake [V̇O 2 max]) is often applied for cardiorespiratory adaptations, however long-HIIT can also challenge the anaerobic and neuromuscular systems. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of 4-week long-HIIT (11 sessions) on anaerobic capacity, repeated sprint ability (RSA), and neuromuscular function. Methods: Twenty active men (V̇O 2 max: 44.8±5.3 mL.kg -1 .min -1 ) performed an incremental running test (T INC ), a supramaximal test consisting in running until the task failure at 115% of maximum velocity achieved in T INC (V INC ) for anaerobic capacity determination, and a RSA test (2×6×35-m all-out sprints) Pre- and Post-HIIT. Before and after RSA, the neuromuscular function was assessed with counter movement jumps (CMJ) and knee extensors maximal isometric voluntary contractions (MVC) with femoral nerve electrical stimulation. Long-HIIT consisted of 10×1-min runs at 90% of V INC with 1-min recovery. Results: Long-HIIT induced significant increase in V̇O 2 max (P=0.0001). Although anaerobic capacity did not change significantly, 60% of the participants improved above the smallest worthwhile change (0.2×standard deviation of Pre-HIIT). The changes in sprint performance over RSA was significantly less post-HIIT than pre (P=0.01). RSA induced significant drop of MVC, high frequency doublet, voluntary activation and CMJ performance at Pre- and Post-HIIT (P<0.01), however, the percentage of reduction from rest to fatigued conditions were not significantly altered at Post-HIIT compared to Pre. Conclusion: 11 sessions of long-HIIT over 4-week improve maximal aerobic power but not anaerobic capacity, and neuromuscular function. Yet, neuromuscular fatigue was similar despite greater speeds reached during RSA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milioni et al. (2024) studied Healthy, physically active (n=20). High-intensity long-interval training (long-HIIT) vs. Pre-HIIT baseline was evaluated on Anaerobic capacity (AC[La+PCr]) (ES 0.34, p=0.22). A 4-week long-HIIT program significantly improved maximal oxygen uptake but did not significantly increase anaerobic capacity (3.70 vs 3.85 L.O2, p=0.22) or alter neuromuscular fatigue resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: