Key result
DHP-CCB initiation links to multiple prescribing cascades, including a ~199% increase in systemic hemostatics.
Why the study?
DHP-CCB adverse effects may trigger unnecessary prescribing of additional medications, termed prescribing cascades, but potential cascades required identification.
Does initiation of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers trigger prescribing cascades for adverse effects in older adults?
Observational (n=388,862)
Does initiation of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers trigger prescribing cascades for adverse effects in older adults?
Effect estimate: aSR 2.99 (95% CI 1.10-8.16)
Initiation of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in older adults is associated with subsequent initiation of multiple other drug classes, highlighting potential underrecognized prescribing cascades.
May signal underrecognized cascades after DHP-CCB initiation in older adults; leaves open causality and should not yet change practice.
Background: Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCB) are widely prescribed antihypertensives whose adverse effects may trigger unnecessary prescribing of additional medications, termed prescribing cascades (PC). We aimed to identify potential DHP-CCB-induced PCs using high-throughput sequence symmetry analysis (HTSSA). Methods: Using Medicare claims data (2011-2020), we identified new users aged ≥66 years with continuous enrollment ≥360 days before and ≥180 days after DHP-CCB initiation. We screened for initiation of 446 "marker" drug classes within ±90 days of DHP-CCB initiation. Sequence ratios compared marker drug initiation after versus before DHP-CCB initiation. Adjusted sequence ratios (aSR), accounting for prescribing trends over time, were calculated with 95% CIs >1 considered statistically significant. Clinical experts classified statistically significant signals as potential PCs through consensus. Results: Among 388,862 DHP-CCB initiators (mean age 76.6 ± 7.5 years; 62.5% women, 92.3% with hypertension), 82 of 446 marker drug classes had significantly elevated aSRs, of which 24 were classified as potential PCs. Strongest signals ranked by highest aSR included other systemic hemostatics (aSR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.10-8.16), other nasal preparations (aSR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.47-2.70), and drugs used in erectile dysfunction (aSR 1.85; 95% CI, 1.27-2.70). Other clinically relevant signals, ranked by number needed to harm (lowest to highest), included sulfonamides (NNTH 104; 95% CI, 98-111), electrolyte solutions (NNTH 216; 95% CI, 196-241), and osmotically acting laxatives (NNTH 710; 95% CI, 540-1056). Conclusion: Potential PCs identified in this Medicare cohort reflected known and underrecognized adverse effects of DHP-CCBs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the clinical consequences of these PCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kulkarni et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hypertension (n=388,862). Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCB) vs. Before DHP-CCB initiation was evaluated on Initiation of marker drug classes (prescribing cascades) (aSR 2.99, 95% CI 1.10-8.16). DHP-CCB initiation was associated with 24 potential prescribing cascades, with the strongest signal for other systemic hemostatics (aSR 2.99; 95% CI 1.10-8.16).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: