Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This reflective paper examines the impact of a Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) project on journalism pedagogy and student development. The study aimed to assess how interdisciplinary, cross-cultural collaboration can enhance journalism education by contextualising global issues within local frameworks. The project, titled “Exploring Initiatives Towards Social Impact Contributing to Better Quality Education,” involved Journalism students from the University of Johannesburg (South Africa) and History students from the University of Dallas, Texas (United States). Framed under Sustainable Development Goal 4 (Quality Education), the collaboration explored sub-themes including inclusive infrastructure, food security, student accommodation, and work preparedness. Students interacted via Zoom and social media platforms to produce multimedia content, such as short documentaries, news packages, public service announcements, and photo essays. The methodology centered on students’ interpretation of the theme and their narrated experiences of behavioural transformation through the project. The findings revealed that COIL projects foster critical understanding of global issues within local contexts while promoting decolonial approaches to problem-solving. The project cultivated the ethos of a global village while respecting local particularities. Discussions highlight the value of interdisciplinary collaboration in journalism education, suggesting that such initiatives prepare students for interconnected professional environments. Recommendations include integrating COIL projects into journalism curricula to promote innovative, inclusive storytelling and cross-cultural competence. This research contributes to scholarship on journalism education by demonstrating how collaborative, technology-mediated learning can transform student perspectives and equip them with skills to address complex societal challenges through a decolonial lens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maud Blose (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: