Key result
Sacubitril-valsartan linked to a ~17 mmHg SBP reduction and improved RV function in HFrEF.
Why the study?
Although sacubitril-valsartan improves ejection fraction and ventricular remodeling in HFrEF, evaluation of diastolic function in these patients has been neglected despite most having diastolic dysfunction.
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve diastolic and right ventricular function in patients with HFrEF?
Observational (n=60)
Does sacubitril-valsartan improve diastolic and right ventricular function in patients with HFrEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 108.8% vs 125.88%
p-value: p=0.001
Sacubitril-valsartan treatment in HFrEF patients is associated with significant improvements in right ventricular function, diastolic function, and NYHA functional class.
Sacubitril-valsartan was associated with lower BP and RV gains in HFrEF; leaves open outcome benefits beyond LVEF.
Background: It was proved that sacubitril-valsartan has a major role in ventricular remodeling resulting in improving ejection fraction and ventricular size. Although evaluating the diastolic function in those presenting with Heart failure and reduced ejection fraction [HFrEF] was neglected, the majority of patients with HFrEF also have diastolic dysfunction.The Aim of the work: In this study, we will focus on studying and explaining the impact of sacubitril–valsartan on diastolic dysfunction and RVD and explaining if the clinical improvement is attributed to improvement in diastolic function and right-side function. Patients and Methods: Our prospective study enrolled 60 HFrEF patients. All of the included patients were submitted for, ECG, and Standard 2D Doppler transthoracic echocardiography. The following parameters were collected; TAPSE [Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion], FAC [fractional area change] 3Systolic pulmonary artery pressure [SPAP], Myocardial performance index [M P I].Results: According to the percentage of improvement among the studied cases, the majority [80%] of class II cases improved and 20% had no change. Similarly, 82.1% of class III patients saw improvement in NYHA classification. Whereas all cases in class IV were improved [100%]. According to the change of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, the mean Systolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] of subjects before therapy with sacubitril–valsartan was 125.88 ±13.7 and it was 108.8± 11.3 of subjects following therapy with sacubitril –valsartan, and this was statistically substantial [P = 0.001]. The mean of Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] of subjects before therapy with sacubitril –valsartan was 85.25 ± 8.9 and it was 74 ± 11.1 of subjects following therapy with sacubitril –valsartan, and this was statistically substantial [P = 0.001].Conclusion: The measured parameters of right ventricular function such as TAPSE, MPI, and Fractional area change were all improved significantly indicating a positive effect for sacubitril-valsartan on the right ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Algedily et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=60). Sacubitril-valsartan vs. Baseline (before therapy) was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure (p=0.001). Sacubitril-valsartan therapy significantly reduced mean systolic blood pressure from 125.88 to 108.8 mmHg (P=0.001) and improved right ventricular function in patients with HFrEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: