Key result
The presence of lead remnants following transvenous lead extraction did not significantly impact long-term survival in the overall patient cohort (HR 0.858; p=0.321).
Why the study?
The long-term significance of lead remnants following transvenous lead extraction remains disputable, especially in infectious patients.
Does incomplete lead removal (lead remnants) impact long-term survival compared to complete lead removal in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction?
Cohort (n=3,741)
Does incomplete lead removal (lead remnants) impact long-term survival compared to complete lead removal in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.858
p-value: p=0.321
Incomplete lead removal during transvenous lead extraction does not independently worsen long-term survival in either infectious or non-infectious cases.
Retained lead remnants may not worsen survival; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change extraction practices.
Background: The long-term significance of lead remnants (LR) following transvenous lead extraction (TLE) remains disputable, especially in infectious patients. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 3741 TLEs focused on the relationship between LR and procedure complexity, complications and long-term survival. Results: The study group consisted of 156 individuals with LR (4.17%), and the control group consisted of 3585 patients with completely removed lead(s). In a multivariable model, a younger patient age at CIED implantation, more CIED procedures and procedure complexity were independent risk factors for retention of non-removable LR. Although patients with LR showed better survival outcomes following TLE (log rank p = 0.041 for non-infectious group and p = 0.017 for infectious group), multivariable Cox regression analysis did not confirm the prognostic significance of LR either in non-infectious [HR = 0.777; p = 0.262], infectious [HR = 0.983; p = 0.934] or the entire group of patients [HR = 0.858; p = 0.321]. Conclusions: 1. Non-removable LRs are encountered in 4.17% of patients. 2. CIED infection has no influence on retention of LRs, but younger patient age, multiple CIED-related procedures and higher levels of procedure complexity are independent risk factors for the presence of LR. 3. Better survival outcomes following TLE in patients with LRs are not the effects of their presence but younger patient and better health status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kutarski et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction (n=3,741). Lead remnants (LR) vs. Completely removed lead(s) was evaluated on Long-term survival (HR 0.858, p=0.321). The presence of lead remnants following transvenous lead extraction did not significantly impact long-term survival in the overall patient cohort (HR 0.858; p=0.321).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: