A 6-month patient activation intervention significantly increased patient activation scores and improved adherence over time compared with usual care in patients with heart failure.
RCT (n=84)
Stratified
84 primarily male patients with heart failure (52% NYHA class III) randomized to a patient activation intervention or usual care for 6 months.
Patient activation intervention vs Usual care
Patient activation (PAM), self-management (SCHFI and MOS Specific Adherence Scale), hospitalizations, and emergency department visits
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Few studies have examined whether chronic heart failure (HF) outcomes can be improved by increasing patient engagement (known as activation) in care and capabilities for self-care management. The objective was to determine the efficacy of a patient activation intervention compared with usual care on activation, self-care management, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits in patients with HF. METHODS: This study used a randomized, 2-group, repeated-measures design. After consent was given, 84 participants were stratified by activation level and randomly assigned to usual care (n = 41) or usual care plus the intervention (n = 43). The primary outcomes and measures were patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), self-management using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI) and the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Specific Adherence Scale, and hospitalizations and emergency department visits. The intervention was a 6-month program to increase activation and improve HF self-management behaviors, such as adhering to medications and implementing health behavior goals. RESULTS: Participants were primarily male (99%), were white (77%), and had New York Heart Association III stage (52%). The mean (SD) age was 66 (11) years, and 71% reported 3 or more comorbidities. The intervention group compared with the usual care group showed a significant increase in activation/PAM scores from baseline to 6 months. No significant group-by-time interactions were found for the SCHFI scales. Although the baseline MOS Specific Adherence Scale mean was lower in the intervention group, results showed a significant group-by-time effect with the intervention group improving more over time. Participants in the intervention group had fewer hospitalizations compared with the usual care group when the baseline activation/PAM level was low or high. CONCLUSION: This study supports the importance of targeted interventions to improve patient activation or engagement in HF care. Further work is needed related to HF self-management measurement and outcomes.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Martha J. Shively
VA San Diego Healthcare System
Nancy Gardetto
VA San Diego Healthcare System
Mary F. Kodiath
San Francisco VA Medical Center
The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
University of California, San Diego
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
VA San Diego Healthcare System
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shively et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Heart failure (n=84). Patient activation intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Patient activation (PAM), self-management (SCHFI and MOS Specific Adherence Scale), hospitalizations, and emergency department visits. A 6-month patient activation intervention significantly increased patient activation scores and improved adherence over time compared with usual care in patients with heart failure.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23aba5b7e293e61ca60a50 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/jcn.0b013e318239f9f9
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: