Why the study?
To compare the acute and chronic effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on glycemic control, body composition, and continuous glucose monitoring in older women with type 2 diabetes.
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training improve glycemic control and body composition compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in older women with type 2 diabetes?
Does low-volume high-intensity interval training improve glycemic control and body composition compared to moderate-intensity continuous training in older women with type 2 diabetes?
In older women with type 2 diabetes, 12 weeks of low-volume HIIT provided similar body composition benefits to MICT, though MICT showed greater improvements in fasting glucose.
MICT yields superior fasting glucose control versus low-volume HIIT in older women with T2D; challenges equivalence of HIIT for glycemic outcomes despite comparable body composition changes.
Objective: To compare the acute and chronic effects of low-volume high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on glycemic control, body composition and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older women with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: Thirty older women (68 ± 5 years) with T2D were randomized in two groups—HIIT (75 min/week) or MICT (150 min/week). Glucose homeostasis (A1c, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR2) and body composition (iDXA) were measured before and after the 12-week exercise intervention. During the first and last week of training (24-h before and 48-h after exercise), the following CGM-derived data were measured: 24-h and peak glucose levels, glucose variability and time spent in hypoglycemia as well as severe and mild hyperglycemia. Results: While lean body mass increased (p = 0.035), total and trunk fat mass decreased (p ≤ 0.007), without any difference between groups (p ≥ 0.81). Fasting glucose levels (p = 0.001) and A1c (p = 0.014) significantly improved in MICT only, with a significant difference between groups for fasting glucose (p = 0.02). Neither HIIT nor MICT impacted CGM-derived data at week 1 (p ≥ 0.25). However, 24-h and peak glucose levels, as well as time spent in mild hyperglycemia, decreased in HIIT at week 12 (p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: These results suggest that 12 weeks of low-volume HIIT is enough to provide similar benefit to MICT for body composition and improve the acute effect of exercise when measured with CGM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcotte‐Chénard et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: