Nationwide matched case-control study finds higher testing frequency does not reduce severe COVID-19 risk.
OBJECTIVES: This study assessed whether higher routine SARS-CoV-2 testing frequency is associated with reduced risk of severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19. METHODS: A nationwide matched case-control study was conducted in Qatar between February 5, 2020 and December 18, 2021, comparing 10,909 severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 cases to 98,811 controls from Qatar's population. Associations between testing frequency (three- and two-level classifications) and severe outcomes were estimated using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher routine SARS-CoV-2 testing frequency was not associated with reduced odds of severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19. In the three-level classification analysis, aORs were 1.03 (95% CI, 0.97-1.10) for intermediate and 0.86 (95% CI, 0.74-1.01) for high versus low testing frequency. In the two-level classification analysis, the aOR was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.07) for high versus low testing frequency. Findings were consistent across subgroup analyses among clinically vulnerable individuals, outcome-stratified analyses by severity level, and sensitivity analyses restricted to Qatari nationals and the earliest severity episode per individual. CONCLUSIONS: Greater routine testing was not associated with reduced individual-level risk of progression to severe COVID-19, supporting more targeted allocation of testing resources while preserving the public health value of testing for case identification and transmission control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abu-Raddad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: