Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study examines bovine brucellosis prevalence in dairy farms, indicating key socio-economic impacts.
This study was conducted to characterize the spatial epidemiology and socio-economics of bovine brucellosis on dairy farms in the Kilinochchi and Mullaitivu Districts of Northern Province, Sri Lanka. A cross-sectional study involving bulk milk sampling and interviews using a structured questionnaire was conducted at 214 dairy farms. Milk samples were tested for Brucella antibodies using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Global spatial clustering statistics and SaTScan were also performed. The association between milk sero-positivity and socio-economic variables was evaluated using univariable analysis. Multi-variable spatial risk factor analysis was conducted using the integrated nested Laplace approximation selecting principal components (PCs) of land use and socio-economic and ecological variables with P<0.2 in the univariable analyses as explanatory variables. The crude and true herd-level prevalence was estimated at 12.1% (26/214; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.4-17.2%), and 11.2% (95% CI: 7.3% to 16.3%), respectively. The Cuzick and Edward's k-nearest neighbor test found significant clustering at 8, 10, and 11 nearest neighbors; however, no local cluster was suggested by SaTScan. In the final multivariable model, the PC representing agricultural land as positive loading and forest land as negative was positively associated with brucellosis sero-positivity, whereas barn cleaning was negatively associated, suggesting good farm hygiene is important for preventing bovine brucellosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugino et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: