Guidelines aim to improve ethical use of AI tools in peer review, suggesting better research communication.
Introduction Peer review is a key component to the success of scientific articles. High-quality peer review ensures reliable information, improves the efficiency of communication, and facilitates the interpretation of findings for better applicability of the data presented in studies. Recently, with the increasing availability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools, especially large language models (LLMs), several scientific journals have published policies and guidelines regarding their use in the peer review process. LLMs are generative AI tools capable of producing text, figures, [...]
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duarte et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: