Retrospective study shows improved clinical reasoning in residents with mind mapping and virtual simulation training, suggesting effective cognitive support.
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of Mind Mapping–Virtual Simulation (MM-VSP) in enhancing clinical reasoning and procedural application competencies among residents. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted with second-year residents (n=80) during their obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) rotations (January 2023 - December 2024). Participants were categorized to either the study group (n=40, receiving MM-VSP training) or the control group (n=40, receiving VSP training), all trained by a unified faculty team using identical clinical cases. Primary outcomes—theoretical knowledge, clinical competency, and learner satisfaction—were extracted from anonymized annual competency assessments. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups (all p > 0.05). No group difference was found in theoretical knowledge (p = 0.76). The study group demonstrated higher scores in History Taking (p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.92), Clinical Reasoning (p < 0.01, r = 0.47), and OB/GYN Specialty Skills (p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.88). Most subdomains of clinical reasoning favoured the study group (p < 0.01, r = 0.41– 0.53). Additionally, the study group reported higher instructional satisfaction (p < 0.01, r = 0.36) and higher perceived learning outcomes (p < 0.01, r = 0.68). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, MM-VSP was associated with better complex reasoning and procedural skills in OB/GYN residents, without additional cognitive load.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: