Quantifies health equity efforts in Kansas counties, indicating significant asset distribution in high-deprivation areas.
Asset Mapping Score Analysis (AMSA) is a standardized approach to organizing data on community assets. This study uses AMSA in two ways to quantify health equity efforts of the Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) project: (1) quantify community assets identified by COPE; and (2) apply AMSA methods in a novel way to evaluate the reach and depth of COPE interventions. COPE aimed to strengthen community-driven public health by establishing community coalitions, called Local Health Equity Action Teams, in 20 Kansas counties. LHEATs were tasked with: (1) identifying local organizations addressing health and social needs; (2) addressing needs through community-level interventions; and (3) addressing the needs of individual community members (clients). Using the AMSA framework, we assigned an asset score to organizational resources in each community and client-level interventions. We examined the relationship between asset scores and the level of area deprivation at the census block level. Of 1,786 organizations, 355 community-level interventions, and 3,241 individual clients supported, 63.4% ( n = 1,133), 64.9% ( n = 231), and 69.6% ( n = 2,256) were in areas of high deprivation (Area Deprivation Index ≥ 7), respectively. Compared to lower ADI block groups, mean asset scores were significantly higher in block groups characterized by higher ADI for all three measures (organizations: 4.2 ± 9.06 vs 1.5 ± 4.85, p < .001; community activities: 0.7 ± 2.61 vs 0.2 ± 0.88, p < .001; individual client support: 55.7 ± 67.52 vs 26.7 ± 25.15, p < .001). In this study, community coalitions prioritized areas of greatest need. GIS-based asset mapping provides a valuable lens for assessing the distribution and intensity of public health efforts beyond traditional evaluation methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollins et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: