Engineering analysis evaluates bioremediation efficacy in campus lakes, suggesting improved material retention strategies.
Campus landscape lakes are vulnerable to combined organic and nutrient pollution because of weak hydrodynamics and limited self-purification capacity. Conventional in-situ remediation often suffers from rapid material loss and short treatment duration. This study evaluated the engineering applicability of microbe-material synergistic remediation through integrated analysis of 28 published field cases and a field investigation of a campus artificial lake in Nanning, China. The integrated results showed removal efficiencies of 82.7% for NH4+-N, 76.4% for COD, and 68.5% for TP. Dissolved oxygen (DO) was identified as a key influencing factor, and COD removal was markedly improved when DO exceeded 2 mg/L. Field monitoring indicated low-oxygen combined pollution, while historical records showed that direct material dosing led to a loss rate of over 60% and an effective treatment duration of less than three weeks. A gel microsphere encapsulation strategy based on alginate and chitosan is therefore proposed to improve material retention and treatment persistence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: