Randomized trial quantifies GLP-1 RA use and obesity management in IBD patients, indicating a rising demand for weight-loss options.
Objective Obesity is associated with poor outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We sought to define current obesity management, assess patient interest in weight-loss interventions and quantify changes in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use and prescribing pathways. Methods We conducted two digital surveys of patients with IBD at a large National Health Service (NHS) Trust and one of IBD clinicians nationally. Surveys were distributed via the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) at baseline (December 2024) and follow-up (January 2026). Results In the most recent patient survey, we found that 31.1% (318/1022) of survey respondents living with IBD were obese. Over 14 months, median (IQR) body mass index (BMI) in the cohort rose from 25.7 (IQR 22.8–30.0) to 26.7 (IQR 23.8–31.1) kg/m² (p=6.4×10 −5 ) and self-reported GLP-1 RA use increased fivefold, from 1.6% (18/1093) to 8.2% (86/1054) (p=4.3×10 −12 ). Most patients obtained GLP-1 RAs through online pharmacies, with the primary indication being weight loss in 93.9% (108/115 (95% CIs 88.0% to 97.1%)) patients. GLP-1 RA use was formally recorded in 33.0% (38/115 (95% 25.1 to 42.1)) patients’ EPR. Female sex was independently associated with GLP-1 RA use (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.94). While 94.1% of clinicians (n=52) believe GLP-1 RAs are safe, 82.7% identified a lack of efficacy data in the IBD population as a major knowledge gap. Interest in clinical trials of GLP-1 RAs as an adjunct to IBD therapy was high among both clinicians (90.4%) and eligible patients (73.9%). Conclusion People living with IBD and obesity want access to weight-loss interventions. There is a rapid, largely hidden surge in direct-to-consumer GLP-1 RA use among patients with IBD. Integrated pathways and prospective trials are urgently needed to monitor safety and evaluate the impact of pharmacological weight loss on IBD disease activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: