Key result
Ticagrelor linked to ~41% lower MACCE risk vs clopidogrel in STEMI with elevated platelets.
Why the study?
Does ticagrelor reduce major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events compared to clopidogrel in patients with STEMI and elevated platelet counts (≥ 350 × 10^9 /L)?
Cohort (n=1,534)
Yes
Does ticagrelor reduce major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events compared to clopidogrel in patients with STEMI and elevated platelet counts (≥ 350 × 10^9 /L)?
In patients with STEMI and an initial admission platelet count ≥ 350 × 10^9 /L, ticagrelor significantly improved 1-year ischemic outcomes and survival compared to clopidogrel without increasing major bleeding risk.
Ticagrelor was associated with lower MACCE risk in this subgroup; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without randomized confirmation.
Background: /L. Methods: Utilizing data from the Tianjin Health and Medical Big Data platform (2010-2023), this retrospective cohort study included patients with acute myocardial infarction from 82 hospitals. After propensity score matching, 461 patients were assigned to two groups: ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were employed to evaluate outcomes, with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included net adverse clinical events (NACEs), all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cerebral infarction, and bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3-5). A MACCE was defined as a composite of cardiac mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction, while a NACE encompassed a MACCE plus bleeding events (BARC types 3-5). Exploratory multivariable analysis confirmed an independent association of ticagrelor with reduced risks of MACCEs (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.37-0.93), NACEs (aHR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.42-0.98), and all-cause mortality (aHR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.83). Conclusions: /L) compared with clopidogrel. In contrast to genetic testing, which is costly, time-consuming (≥24-72 hours), and impractical in emergencies, this simple, universally available platelet count threshold offers an immediate, practical biomarker for selecting potent P2Y12 inhibition in acute settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JI et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) with elevated platelet counts (n=1,534). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (aHR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, p=0.02). Ticagrelor significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events by 41% (aHR 0.59) compared with clopidogrel in patients with STEMI and elevated admission platelet counts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: