Key result
In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ticagrelor did not significantly reduce mortality (RR 0.857) or major adverse cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel.
Why the study?
While aspirin plus clopidogrel is the standard oral regimen in most cases, this study aimed to compare the effect of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in the treatment of STEMI.
Does ticagrelor improve clinical outcomes and reperfusion compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Meta-Analysis (n=10,569)
Does ticagrelor improve clinical outcomes and reperfusion compared to clopidogrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
Relative Risk: 0.857 (95% CI 0.637–1.153)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.1% vs 3.7%
p-value: p=0.31
In patients with STEMI, ticagrelor showed non-significant trends toward improved clinical outcomes (mortality, MACE, MI, stroke) and TIMI flow compared to clopidogrel, with a non-significant increase in bleeding.
Background Rupture of unstable coronary atherosclerotic plaque leads to acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction which is the most critical type of acute coronary syndrome. Dual anti-platelet therapy is one the main treatments and the combination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel is recognized as the standard oral regimen in most cases. Ticagrelor is a new generation of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, which is a direct P2Y12 receptor antagonist. The goal of this study is to compare the effect of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in treatment of STEMI. Methods In this study, Pub Med, Scopus, Google Scholar Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane library clinical trials.gov databases were investigated. Inhomogeneity between studies was assessed using the I2 index and the Q statistic. The random effects model was used to combine studies. The Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to assess the publication bias. A probability value of less than 5 percent was considered a significant level. Results Eleven studies were included in this meta-analysis. Five thousand two hundred seventy-four patients in the Ticagrelor group and 5,295 patients in the Clopidogrel group were examined. The mean (standard deviation) age of the patients was 58.84 years (2.70) and 59.92 years (3.19) in the Ticagrelor group and the Clopidogrel group, respectively. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, compared to Clopidogrel, Ticagrelor had a protective effect on the outcomes of recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), post-myocardial infarction bleeding according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, mortality, and reperfusion state regarding thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) Flow Grading system. However, this effect was not statistically significant, and the publication bias was not statistically significant either. Conclusions According to the present study, although Ticagrelor increased the chance of bleeding according to the BARC score, compared to Clopidogrel, there was more improvement in TIMI score and fewer problems related to stroke, mortality, MI, and MACE in patients who took Ticagrelor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geravandi et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) (n=10,569). Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Mortality (RR 0.857, 95% CI 0.637-1.153, p=0.31). In patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ticagrelor did not significantly reduce mortality (RR 0.857) or major adverse cardiovascular events compared to clopidogrel.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: