Evaluates buckling behavior in thin-walled composite beams, suggesting novel design strategies for aerospace applications.
Thin-walled composite beams with unsymmetric laminates are attracting increasing attention in lightweight aerospace and mechanical structures because they enable enhanced stiffness tailoring and weight reduction beyond the limitations of conventional symmetric stacking sequences. However, despite their practical relevance, unsymmetric thin-walled laminates have received comparatively limited attention in the available buckling literature due to the additional complexity introduced by membrane–bending coupling effects. This study presents an efficient and physically transparent formulation for the buckling analysis of thin-walled composite beams with both symmetric and unsymmetric layups by combining Generalized Beam Theory (GBT) with the Ritz method. The proposed GBT-Ritz framework captures global, local, distortional, torsional, and shear-related deformation modes while consistently incorporating laminate coupling effects associated with unsymmetric configurations. The formulation is applicable to open, closed, branched, and unbranched cross-sections commonly encountered in aerospace structures. Validation against ABAQUS V2017 shell finite element models demonstrates excellent agreement (with discrepancies generally below 6%) in predicting critical buckling loads and mode shapes for various geometries and boundary conditions. The results show that unsymmetric laminates can significantly influence buckling behavior, particularly in open sections and intermediate beam lengths where coupling effects become dominant. Compared with conventional finite element approaches, the proposed method achieves substantially lower computational cost (providing speed-up factors of 1.5 to 2.5) while preserving clear physical insight into interacting instability mechanisms. Overall, the developed framework provides an efficient and practically relevant tool for the analysis and design of advanced thin-walled composite structures with tailored unsymmetric laminates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kharghani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: