Abstract Introduction 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) has gained popularity as an irrigant for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). In vitro data has explored interactions between CHG and minocycline/rifampin impregnated (M/R) IPP surfaces. Objective We aim to assess clinical infection rates between intraoperative CHG use and M/R impregnated IPPs in a large multi-institutional cohort. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1,604 patients who underwent IPP implantation across 12 referral centers. Data collection spanned from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2024. Each surgeon contributed patients who underwent IPP implantation with the use of CHG as an irrigant and an equal number of consecutive control patients where CHG was not used. The primary outcome was explant for postoperative infection. Patient demographics were compared using chi squared testing and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with infection. Results M/R impregnated devices accounted for 695 cases. The incidence of infection with intraoperative CHG use was 1.7% (5/289) and was not significantly different from the 2.5% (10/406) infection rate in those without CHG (p=0.429). Patients with infection had a higher prevalence of hypertension and history of priapism (Table 1). On logistic regression analysis, only a history of priapism was significantly associated with an increased odds of infection (OR 11.47, 95%CI 2.25-58.40, p=0.003). Intraoperative CHG use was not associated with postoperative infection (OR 0.69, 95%CI 0.2-2.06. p=0.514). Conclusions In a large multi-institutional cohort, there was no difference in infection rate for patients with or without intraoperative CHG use, consistent with prior in vitro findings. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Intuitive Surgical, Fidelis, Urofill, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Cynosure, Antares Pharma, Clarus Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharma; Endo Pharma.
Chawareb et al. (Mon,) studied this question.