Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores treatment-related burdens in immune thrombocytopenia, highlighting patient preferences.
Limited data exist on how patients and physicians perceive immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) symptoms and treatment-related burden. I-WISh (ITP World Impact Survey) 2.0 surveyed 1018 patients and 431 physicians in 15 countries to characterize the impact of ITP and its treatments on patients. Approximately one-third of patients reported that ITP had a high impact on daily activities and family/social life, and 54% reported that it had a high impact on emotional wellbeing. Patients and physicians generally aligned on symptoms and treatment goals, but more patients (48%) than physicians (29%) reported fatigue as common and problematic. Ninety-seven percent of patients reported that they had received treatment for ITP, most commonly corticosteroids. Most patients and 54% of physicians were satisfied with available treatments, although patients reported treatment-related burdens. Twenty-eight percent confirmed they would have chosen a different treatment. Two-thirds of patients were in a stable, sustained remission, and most had never paused treatment (67%). Nevertheless, two-thirds of patients preferred limiting time on treatment and/or not being on lifelong treatment. I-WISh 2.0 emphasizes the extensive disease and treatment burden faced by patients living with ITP, especially the impact of fatigue. It also reminds us that shared decision-making is needed to ensure treatment goals are aligned with patient expectations, including health-related quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cooper et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: