Evaluates ultrabroadband absorption in a three-layer optical absorber, indicating effective design implications.
A structurally simple three-layer optical absorber is proposed and systematically investigated, consisting of a continuous Ti ground plane, a SiO2 dielectric spacer, and a Ti tetrahedral nanostructure. The absorber is constructed on a periodic square unit cell, where the lateral dimension directly determines the base width and sidewall inclination angle of the tetrahedral structure, thereby enabling effective modulation of the optical response. Full-wave electromagnetic simulations performed using COMSOL Multiphysics (version 6.0) are employed to evaluate the influence of geometric parameters on broadband absorption behavior. The optimized structure achieves a near-unity absorptivity of 0.9999 at 200 nm and maintains an effective absorption bandwidth (absorptivity > 0.9) spanning 200–3000 nm, covering the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared spectral regions. Parametric analysis reveals that the tetrahedral height primarily governs long-wavelength extension through enhanced optical path length, graded-index transition, and improved electromagnetic field confinement, while the unit cell width strongly influences impedance matching and localized field localization. In contrast, the Ti ground layer thickness exhibits minimal influence once it exceeds the optical skin depth, confirming its primary role as a transmission-blocking reflective substrate. Impedance retrieval analysis shows that the real part of the normalized impedance remains close to unity and the imaginary part approaches zero over most of the operating range, demonstrating that the ultrabroadband absorption behavior is dominated by effective impedance matching rather than isolated narrowband resonances. Furthermore, electric and magnetic field distribution analyses reveal that electromagnetic energy dissipation is concentrated near the tetrahedral apex and metal–dielectric interfaces, indicating the coexistence of localized plasmonic modes, cavity-assisted absorption, and multi-scale optical confinement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Du et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: