Reveals molecular characteristics and resistance profiles in broiler E. coli, highlighting public health risks.
The emergence of plasmid-mediated tigecycline resistance in food-producing animals poses a significant threat to global public health by compromising a last-resort antimicrobial. This study investigated the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and molecular genetic characteristics of tigecycline-resistant Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolated from broiler cecal samples in the Jinan region of Shandong Province, China, between 2020 and 2024. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that high-level resistance to colistin (87.5%, 14/16), florfenicol (81.3%, 13/15), and enrofloxacin (75.0%, 12/16) was observed. Notably, a single isolate was resistant to meropenem (6.3%, 1/16). Whole-genome sequencing and subsequent in silico analysis demonstrated that all 16 tigecycline-resistant isolates harbored the tigecycline resistance gene tet(X4), the primary determinant of resistance. Molecular typing identified a diverse population structure, with sequence type 224 (ST224) being the dominant clone, accounting for 37.5% (6/16) of the isolates. The genetic milieu of resistance was complex, characterized by the co-existence of tet(X4) with multiple other clinically important resistance genes, including the mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-1 (87.5%, 14/16) and various extended-spectrum β-lactamase genes such as blaCTX-M variants and, critically, blaNDM-5. Furthermore, an array of virulence factor genes was identified, with a particularly high prevalence of the toxin gene astA (68.8%, 11/16) and the bacteriocin gene cma (50.0%, 8/16), indicating pathogenic potential. This convergence of resistance and virulence in a foodborne pathogen highlights an urgent need for continuous One Health surveillance to mitigate the risks posed by these potentially untreatable “superbugs” to both animal and human health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: