Randomized trial explores multi-type post-translational modification prediction, suggesting a new comprehensive modeling approach.
As a core mechanism of epigenetic regulation in eukaryotes, protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) require precise prediction to decipher dynamic life activity networks. To address the limitations of existing deep learning models in cross-modal feature fusion, domain generalization, and architectural optimization, this study proposes UniPTMs: a unified framework for multi-type PTM prediction. The framework innovatively establishes a “Master–Slave” dual-path collaborative architecture: the master path dynamically integrates high-dimensional representations of protein sequences, structures, and evolutionary information through a bidirectional gated cross-attention module, while the slave path optimizes feature discrepancies and recalibration between structural and traditional features using a low-dimensional fusion network. Complemented by a multi-scale adaptive convolutional pyramid for capturing local feature patterns and a bidirectional hierarchical gated fusion network enabling multi-level feature integration across paths, the framework employs a hierarchical dynamic weighting fusion mechanism to intelligently aggregate multimodal features. Enhanced by a novel hierarchical contrastive loss function for feature consistency optimization, UniPTMs demonstrates significant performance improvements (3.2–11.4% Matthews correlation coefficient and 4.2–14.3% average precision increases) over state-of-the-art models across five modification types. Additionally, to strike a balance between model complexity and performance, we have developed a lightweight variant named UniPTMs-mini. UniPTMs successfully transcends the single-type prediction paradigm, providing a unified and highly accurate approach for multi-type PTM prediction. This robust architecture, alongside its lightweight variant, offers a powerful and practical tool for advancing epigenetic research and further deciphering dynamic life activity networks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: